Hehe I came here following a link about n=4 sym…I am looking for a really good, comprehensive review of N=4 SYM, so far without success. Have you seem such a beast?
Depends how comprehensive you’re talking. So much has been done with the theory over the years that I don’t think a review could cover all of it. Just the amplitudes stuff is more promising, though even there I think people would mostly cover the topics they’re closest to.
Hehe I came here following a link about n=4 sym…I am looking for a really good, comprehensive review of N=4 SYM, so far without success. Have you seem such a beast?
LikeLike
Depends how comprehensive you’re talking. So much has been done with the theory over the years that I don’t think a review could cover all of it. Just the amplitudes stuff is more promising, though even there I think people would mostly cover the topics they’re closest to.
LikeLike